Paper detail

Recency-based preferential attachment models

Preferential attachment models were shown to be very effective in predicting such important properties of real-world networks as the power-law degree distribution, small diameter, etc. Many different models are based on the idea of preferential attachment: LCD, Buckley-Osthus, Holme-Kim, fitness, random Apollonian network, and many others. Although preferential attachment models reflect some important properties of real-world networks, they do not allow to model the so-called recency property. Recency property reflects the fact that in many real networks vertices tend to connect to other vertices of similar age. This fact motivated us to introduce a new class of models - recency-based models. This class is a generalization of fitness models, which were suggested by Bianconi and Barabasi. Bianconi and Barabasi extended preferential attachment models with pages' inherent quality or fitness of vertices. When a new vertex is added to the graph, it is joined to some already existing vertices that are chosen with probabilities proportional to the product of their fitness and incoming degree. We generalize fitness models by adding a recency factor to the attractiveness function. This means that pages are gaining incoming links according to their attractiveness, which is determined by the incoming degree of the page (current popularity), its inherent quality (some page-specific constant) and age (new pages are gaining new links more rapidly). We analyze different properties of recency-based models. In particular, we show that some distributions of inherent quality lead to the power-law degree distribution.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.