Paper detail

Reassignment of magic numbers for icosahedral Au clusters: 310, 564, 928 and 1426

Icosahedral Au clusters with three and four shells of atoms are found to deviate significantly from the commonly assumed Mackay structures. By introducing additional atoms in the surface shell and creating a vacancy in the center of the cluster, the calculated energy per atom can be lowered significantly, according to several different descriptions of the interatomic interaction. Analogous icosahedral structures with five and six shells of atoms are generated using the same structural motifs and are similarly found to be more stable than Mackay icosahedra. The lowest energy per atom is obtained with clusters containing 310, 564, 928 and 1426 atoms, as compared with the commonly assumed magic numbers of 309, 561, 923 and 1415. Some of the vertices in the optimized clusters have a hexagonal ring of atoms, rather than a pentagon, with the vertex atom missing. An inner shell atom in some cases moves outwards by more than an Ångström into the surface shell at the vertex site. This feature, as well as the wide distribution of nearest-neighbor distances in the surface layer, can strongly influence the catalytic properties of icosahedral clusters. The structural optimization is initially carried out using the GOUST method with atomic forces estimated with the EMT empirical potential function, but the atomic coordinates are then refined by minimization using electron density functional theory (DFT) or Gaussian approximation potential (GAP). A single energy barrier is found to separate the Mackay icosahedron from a lower energy structure where a string of atoms moves outwards in a concerted manner from the center so as to create a central vacancy while placing an additional atom in the surface shell.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.