Paper detail

Reassessing the discovery potential of the $B \to K^{*} \ell^+\ell^-$ decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities

We critically examine the potential to disentangle Standard Model (SM) and New Physics (NP) in $B \to K^* μ^+μ^-$ and $B\to K^* e^+ e^-$ decays, focusing on $(i)$ the LHCb anomaly, $(ii)$ the search for right-handed currents, and $(iii)$ lepton-universality violation. Restricting ourselves to the large-recoil region, we advocate a parameterisation of the hadronic matrix elements that separates model-independent information about nonperturbative QCD from the results of model calculations. We clarify how to estimate corrections to the heavy-quark limit that would generate a right-handed (virtual) photon in the $b\to sγ$ contribution to the decay. We then apply this approach to the discussion of various sets of observables of increasing theoretical cleanness. First, we show that angular observables in the optimized $P_i^{(\prime)}$ basis are, in general, not robust against the long-distance QCD effects. While a fit to data favours a NP contribution to the semileptonic operators of the type $δC_9\simeq-1.5$, this comes at a relatively small statistical significance of $\lesssim2 σ$, once power corrections are properly accounted for. Second, two of these observables, $P_1$ and $P_3^{CP}$ are particularly clean at very low $q^2$ and sensitive probes of right-handed quark currents. We discuss their potential to set stringent bounds on the Wilson coefficient $C_7^\prime$, especially using data of the electronic mode. Finally, in light of the recent hint of lepton-universality violation in $B^+\to K^+\ell\ell$, we introduce and investigate new lepton-universality observables involving angular observables of the muonic and electronic modes and their zero crossings, and show that, if the effect is of the size suggested by experiment, these can clearly distinguish between different NP explanations in terms of underlying semileptonic operators.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.