Paper detail

Reasoning about inter-procedural security requirements in IoT applications

The importance of information security dramatically increased and will further grow due to the shape and nature of the modern computing industry. Software is published at a continuously increasing pace. The Internet of Things and security protocols are two examples of domains that pose a great security challenge, due to how diverse the needs for those software may be, and a generalisation of the capabilities regarding the toolchain necessary for testing is becoming a necessity. Oftentimes, these software are designed starting from a formal model, which can be verified with appropriate model checkers. These models, though, do not represent the actual implementation, which can deviate from the model and hence certain security properties might not be inherited from the model, or additional issues could be introduced in the implementation. In this paper we describe a proposal for a novel technique to assess software security properties from LLVM bitcode. We perform various static analyses, such as points-to analysis, call graph and control-flow graph, with the aim of deriving from them an 'accurate enough' formal model of the paths taken by the program, which are then going to be examined via consolidated techniques by matching them against a set of defined rules. The proposed workflow then requires further analysis with more precise methods if a rule is violated, in order to assess the actual feasibility of such path(s). This step is required as the analyses performed to derive the model to analyse are over-approximating the behaviour of the software.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.