Paper detail

REAS3: A revised implementation of the geosynchrotron model for radio emission from air showers

Over the past years, the freely available Monte Carlo-code REAS which simulates radio emission from air showers based on the geosynchrotron model, was used regularly for comparisons with data. However, it emerged that in the previous version of the code, emission due to the variation of the number of charged particles within an air shower was not taken into account. In the following article, we show the implementation of these emission contributions in REAS3 by the inclusion of ``end-point contributions'' and discuss the changes on the predictions of REAS obtained by this revision. The basis for describing radiation processes is an universal description which is gained by the use of the end-point formulation. Hence, not only pure geomagnetic radiation is simulated with REAS3 but also radiation due to the variation of the net charge excess in the air shower, independent of the Earth's magnetic field. Furthermore, we present a comparison of lateral distributions of LOPES data with REAS3-simulated distributions. The comparison shows a good argeement between both, data and REAS3 simulations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.