Paper detail

Reanalysis of ep Elastic Scattering Data in Terms of Proton Electromagnetic Formfactors

We have made the comparison of three parametrizations of the proton electromagnetic form factors in the space-like region using the largest data set on $e^{\pm} p$ elastic scattering ever used. All models have a correct analytical structure with a minimal set of well known singularities. For the first time an effective two-pion intermediate coulombic bound state (pionium) was included into GVMD for nucleon formfactors. For the proton charge radius an estimate derived from our best fits is as follows: r_E^p [\rm fm] = 0.897 \pm 0.002(exp) \pm 0.001(norm) \pm 0.003(models). The traditional ``model independent'' fit by quadratic polynomial gives, in our estimation technology, a much cruder estimate r^p_{E,polinomial} [\rm fm] = 0.887 \pm 0.006(exp) \pm 0.096(norm). Both estimates are closer to the value estimated from the recent hydrogen Lamb shift measurements.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.