Paper detail

Realization of quantum diffraction of a thermal flux

The first evidence of the dc Josephson effect dates back to 1963 when J. S. Rowell measured the diffraction pattern of the critical current flowing through a single superconducting tunnel junction subjected to an in-plane magnetic field. Interference of Josephson currents through two tunnel junctions connected in parallel was achieved one year later leading to the first ever superconducting quantum interferometer. The latter, together with Rowell's observations, constituted the unequivocal demonstration of the Josephson supercurrent-phase relation. Yet, the Josephson effect has further profound implications going beyond electrical transport, as the interplay between the Cooper condensate and unpaired electrons provides thermal flow through the junction with phase coherence as well. Here we report the first demonstration of quantum diffraction of a heat flux showing that a temperature-biased single Josephson junction is exploited as a diffractor for thermal currents. Specifically, thermal diffraction manifests itself with a peculiar modulation of the electron temperature in a small metallic electrode nearby-contacted to the junction when sweeping the magnetic flux $Φ$. Remarkably, the observed temperature dependence exhibits $Φ$-symmetry and a clear reminiscence with a Fraunhofer-like modulation pattern, as expected fingerprints for a quantum diffraction phenomenon. Our results confirm a pristine prediction of quantum heat transport and, joined with double-junction heat interferometry demonstrated in Nature 492, 401 (2012), exemplify the complementary and conclusive proof of the existence of phase-dependent thermal currents in Josephson-coupled superconductors. This approach combined with well-known methods for phase-biasing superconducting circuits provides with a novel tool for mastering heat fluxes at the nanoscale.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.