Paper detail

Realistic sources, receivers and walls improve the generalisability of virtually-supervised blind acoustic parameter estimators

Blind acoustic parameter estimation consists in inferring the acoustic properties of an environment from recordings of unknown sound sources. Recent works in this area have utilized deep neural networks trained either partially or exclusively on simulated data, due to the limited availability of real annotated measurements. In this paper, we study whether a model purely trained using a fast image-source room impulse response simulator can generalize to real data. We present an ablation study on carefully crafted simulated training sets that account for different levels of realism in source, receiver and wall responses. The extent of realism is controlled by the sampling of wall absorption coefficients and by applying measured directivity patterns to microphones and sources. A state-of-the-art model trained on these datasets is evaluated on the task of jointly estimating the room's volume, total surface area, and octave-band reverberation times from multiple, multichannel speech recordings. Results reveal that every added layer of simulation realism at train time significantly improves the estimation of all quantities on real signals.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.