Paper detail

Realistic collisional water transport during terrestrial planet formation: Self-consistent modeling by an N-body--SPH hybrid code

According to current evidence the water inventory of Earth (and perhaps similar exoplanets) was transported inwards via (giant) collisions during the chaotic final phase of planet formation. In dynamical simulations water delivery is still studied almost exclusively by assuming oversimplified perfect merging (PM), even though it is particularly prone to collisional transfer and loss. To close this gap we have developed a framework to model collisional water transport by direct combination of long-term N-body computations with dedicated 3D SPH simulations for each collision. Post-collision water inventories are self-consistently traced further, in accretionary or erosive as well as hit-and-run encounters. The latter are frequent outcomes among protoplanets, where besides collisional losses, water transfer between the encountering bodies has to be considered. This hybrid approach enables us for the first time to trace the full dynamical and collisional evolution of ~200 bodies throughout the whole late-stage accretion phase (several 100 Myrs). As a first application we choose a Solar System-like architecture, with already formed giant planets on either circular or eccentric orbits and a debris disk spanning from 0.5 - 4 au. Realistic collision treatment leads to considerably different results than PM, with lower mass planets and water inventories reduced by a factor of two or more. Due to a combination of collisional losses and considerably lengthened accretion, final water contents especially with giant planets on circular orbits are strongly reduced to more Earth-like values. Water delivery to potentially habitable planets is dominated by few decisive collisions, mostly with embryo-sized or larger bodies. The high frequency of hit-and-run, with generally low water (and mass) transfer efficiencies, are a crucial part of this process, and of system-wide evolution in general.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.