Paper detail

Real-Time Phase Contrast MRI to quantify Cerebral arterial flow change during variations breathing

Cerebral arterial blood flow (CABF) can be investigated in few seconds without any synchronization by Real-Time phase contrast. Significant changes in CABF were found between expiration and inspiration during normal breathing of healthy volunteers. Synopsis (100/100) Real-time phase contrast MRI has been applied to investigate cerebral arterial blood flow (CABF) during normal breathing of healthy volunteers. We developed a novel time-domain analysis method to quantify the effect of normal breathing on several parameters of CABF. We found the existence of a delay between the recorded respiratory signal from the belt sensor and the breathing frequency component present in the reconstructed arterial blood flows. During the expiratory, the mean flow rate of CABF increased by 4.4$\pm$1.7%, stroke volume of CABF increased by 9.8$\pm$3.1% and the duration of the cardiac period of CABF increased by 8.1$\pm$3%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.