Paper detail

Reactive molecular dynamics at constant pressure via non-reactive force fields: extending the Empirical Valence Bond method to the isothermal-isobaric ensemble

The Empirical Valence Bond (EVB) method offers a suitable framework to obtain reactive potentials through the coupling of non-reactive force fields. However, most of the implemented functional forms for the coupling terms depend on complex spatial coordinates, which precludes the computation of the stress tensor for condensed phase systems and prevents the possibility to carry out EVB molecular dynamics in the isothermal-isobaric (NPT) ensemble. In this work, we make use of coupling terms that depend on the energy gaps, defined as the energy differences between the participating non-reactive force fields, and derive an expression for the EVB stress tensor suitable for computations. Implementation of this new methodology is tested for a model of a single reactive malonaldehyde solvated in non-reactive water. Computed densities and classical probability distributions in the NPT ensemble reveals a negligible role of the reactive potential in the limit of low concentrated solutions, thus corroborating the validity of standard approximations customarily adopted for EVB simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.