Paper detail

Reaching a Consensus on Random Networks: The Power of Few

A community of $n$ individuals splits into two camps, Red and Blue. The individuals are connected by a social network, which influences their colors. Everyday, each person changes his/her color according to the majority among his/her neighbors. Red (Blue) wins if everyone in the community becomes Red (Blue) at some point. We study this process when the underlying network is the random Erdos-Renyi graph $G(n, p)$. With a balanced initial state ($n/2$ person in each camp), it is clear that each color wins with the same probability. Our study reveals that for any constants $p$ and $\varepsilon$, there is a constant $C$ such that if one camp has $n/2 +C$ individuals, then it wins with probability at least $1 - \varepsilon$. The surprising key fact here is that $C$ does not depend on $n$, the population of the community. When $p=1/2$ and $\varepsilon =.1$, one can set $C$ as small as 6. If the aim of the process is to choose a candidate, then this means it takes only $6$ "defectors" to win an election unanimously with overwhelming odd.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.