Paper detail

Re-infection by untreated partners of people treated for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: mathematical modelling study

Objectives: Re-infection after treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae reduces the effect of control interventions. We explored the impact of delays in partner treatment on the expected probability of re-infection of index cases using a mathematical model. Methods: We used previously reported parameter distributions to calculate the probability that index cases would be re-infected by their untreated partners. We then assumed different delays between index case and partner treatment to calculate the probabilities of re-infection. Results: In the absence of partner treatment, the medians of the expected re-infection probabilities are 19.4% (interquartile range (IQR) 9.2-31.6%) for chlamydia and 12.5% (IQR 5.6-22.2%) for gonorrhoea. If all current partners receive treatment three days after the index case, the expected re-infection probabilities are 4.2% (IQR 2.1-6.9%) for chlamydia and 5.5% (IQR 2.6-9.5%) for gonorrhoea. Conclusions: Quicker partner referral and treatment can substantially reduce re-infection rates for chlamydia and gonorrhoea. The formula we used to calculate re-infection rates can be used to inform the design of randomised controlled trials of novel partner notification technologies like accelerated partner therapy.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.