Paper detail

Rayleigh-Ritz majorization error bounds with applications to FEM

The Rayleigh-Ritz (RR) method finds the stationary values, called Ritz values, of the Rayleigh quotient on a given trial subspace as approximations to eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator $A$. If the trial subspace is $A$-invariant, the Ritz values are exactly some of the eigenvalues of $A$. Given two subspaces $\X$ and $\Y$ of the same finite dimension, such that $\X$ is $A$-invariant, the absolute changes in the Ritz values of $A$ with respect to $\X$ compared to the Ritz values with respect to $\Y$ represent the RR absolute eigenvalue approximation error. Our first main result is a sharp majorization-type RR error bound in terms of the principal angles between $\X$ and $\Y$ for an arbitrary $A$-invariant $\X$, which was a conjecture in [SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 30 (2008), pp. 548-559]. Second, we prove a novel type of RR error bound that deals with the products of the errors, rather than the sums. Third, we establish majorization bounds for the relative errors. We extend our bounds to the case $\dim\X\leq\dim\Y<\infty$ in Hilbert spaces and apply them in the context of the finite element method.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.