Paper detail

Rationalizing polymer swelling and collapse under repulsive to highly attractive cosolvent conditions

The collapse and swelling behavior of a generic homopolymer is studied using implicit-solvent, explicit-cosolvent Langevin dynamics computer simulations for varying interaction strengths. The systematic investigation reveals that polymer swelling is maximal if both monomer-monomer and monomer-cosolute interactions are weakly attractive. In the most swollen state the cosolute density inside the coil is remarkably bulk-like and homogenous. Highly attractive monomer-cosolute interactions, however, are found to induce a collapse of the chain which, in contrast to the collapsed case induced by purely repulsive cosolvents, exhibits a considerably enhanced cosolute density within the globule. Thus, collapsed states, although appearing similar on a first glance, may result from very different mechanisms with distinct final structural and thermodynamics properties. Two theoretical models, one based on an effective one-component description where the cosolutes have been integrated out, and a fully two-component Flory -- de Gennes like model, support the simulation findings above and serve for interpretation. In particular, the picture is supported that collapse in highly attractive cosolvents is driven by crosslinking-like bridging effects, while the ratio of attraction width to cosolute size plays a critical role behind this mechanism. Only if polymer-cosolute interactions are not too short-ranged swelling effects should be observable. Our findings may be important for the interpretation of the effects of cosolutes on polymer and protein conformational structure, in particular for highly attractive interaction combinations, such as provided by urea, GdmCl, NaI, or NaClO4 near peptide-like moieties.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.