Paper detail

Rate-Splitting Multiple Access for Multi-Antenna Joint Radar and Communications with Partial CSIT: Precoder Optimization and Link-Level Simulations

Dual-Functional Radar-Communication (DFRC) systems have been investigated to manage the inter-system interference between radar and communication systems. However, the studies in literature often assume that the DFRC possesses perfect Channel State Information at the Transmitter (CSIT), which is an unrealistic assumption due to the inevitable CSIT errors in practical deployments. In this work, we aim to design a DFRC system under the practical assumption of partial CSIT. To achieve this, the proposed DFRC marries the capabilities of a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) radar with Rate-Splitting Multiple Access (RSMA). RSMA is a powerful downlink communication scheme based on linearly precoded Rate-Splitting (RS) that partially decodes multi-user interference (MUI) and partially treats it as noise and is inherently robust to partial CSIT. Using RSMA, the DFRC precoders are optimized in the presence of partial CSIT to simultaneously maximize the Average Weighted Sum-Rate (AWSR) under Quality-of-Service (QoS) constraints and minimize the DFRC beampattern Mean Squared Error (MSE) against an ideal MIMO radar beampattern. Simulation results demonstrate that the RSMA-based DFRC largely outperforms DFRCs based on other commonly used strategies such as Space Division Multiple Access (SDMA) and Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA). Specifically, the common stream unique in the RSMA-based DFRC allows for flexible rate partitioning to guarantee user rate fairness with partial CSIT while also being the main contributor to generating a directional beampattern for effective radar sensing. The practical performance of the DFRC is then further assessed through Link-Level simulations (LLS) to take into account the effects of coding and modulation in the finite length regime as well as the channel aging due to mobility and latency, where the superiority of RSMA is again corroborated.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.