Paper detail

Rate of convergence of the mean for sub-additive ergodic sequences

For sub-additive ergodic processes $\{X_{m,n}\}$ with weak dependence, we analyze the rate of convergence of $\mathbb{E}X_{0,n}/n$ to its limit $g$. We define an exponent $γ$ given roughly by $\mathbb{E}X_{0,n} \sim ng + n^γ$, and, assuming existence of a fluctuation exponent $χ$ that gives $\mathrm{Var}~X_{0,n} \sim n^{2χ}$, we provide a lower bound for $γ$ of the form $γ\geq χ$. The main requirement is that $χ\neq 1/2$. In the case $χ=1/2$ and under the assumption $\mathrm{Var}~X_{0,n} = O(n/(\log n)^β)$ for some $β>0$, we prove $γ\geq χ- c(β)$ for a $β$-dependent constant $c(β)$. These results show in particular that non-diffusive fluctuations are associated to non-trivial $γ$. Various models, including first-passage percolation, directed polymers, the minimum of a branching random walk and bin packing, fall into our general framework, and the results apply assuming $χ$ exists. In the case of first-passage percolation in $\mathbb Z^d$, we provide a version of $γ\geq -1/2$ without assuming existence of $χ$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.