Paper detail

Rarity of extremal edges in random surfaces and other theoretical applications of cluster algorithms

Motivated by questions on the delocalization of random surfaces, we prove that random surfaces satisfying a Lipschitz constraint rarely develop extremal gradients. Previous proofs of this fact relied on reflection positivity and were thus limited to random surfaces defined on highly symmetric graphs, whereas our argument applies to general graphs. Our proof makes use of a cluster algorithm and reflection transformation for random surfaces of the type introduced by Swendsen-Wang, Wolff and Evertz et al. We discuss the general framework for such cluster algorithms, reviewing several particular cases with emphasis on their use in obtaining theoretical results. Two additional applications are presented: A reflection principle for random surfaces and a proof that pair correlations in the spin $O(n)$ model have monotone densities, strengthening Griffiths' first inequality for such correlations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.