Paper detail

Rare Top Decays in Minimal and Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension

The flavour changing decays of the top quark are severely suppressed in the Standard Model by virtue of the Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani mechanism. Many beyond Standard Model extensions predict the decay rates at a level that is observable in the LHC. We perform a complete one-loop calculation of the flavour changing top quark decays $t\to cγ$ and $t\to ch$ in the universal extra dimensional model. Apart from considering the decay rates in the minimal version of the model, we also calculate the rates in the non-minimal scenario where the presence of boundary localised terms interestingly modify the set-up. We find that the decay rates in the minimal variant of the model do not change much from their Standard Model values. In the non-minimal version of this model, these decay rates can be higher for specific choices of the boundary localised parameters for a certain range of inverse compactification radius. But these model parameters lead to Kaluza-Klein particle masses that are in tension with various searches at the LHC.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.