Paper detail

Rare extinction events in cyclic predator-prey games

In the May-Leonard model of three cyclically competing species, we analyze the statistics of rare events in which all three species go extinct due to strong but rare fluctuations. These fluctuations are from the tails of the probability distribution of species concentrations. They render a coexistence of three populations unstable even if the coexistence is stable in the deterministic limit. We determine the mean time to extinction (MTE) by using a WKB-ansatz in the master equation that represents the stochastic description of this model. This way, the calculation is reduced to a problem of classical mechanics and amounts to solving a Hamilton-Jacobi equation with zero-energy Hamiltonian. We solve the corresponding Hamilton's equations of motion in six-dimensional phase space numerically by using the Iterative Action Minimization Method. This allows to project on the optimal path to extinction, starting from a parameter choice where the three-species coexistence-fixed point undergoes a Hopf bifurcation and becomes stable. Specifically for our system of three species, extinction events can be triggered along various paths to extinction, differing in their intermediate steps. We compare our analytical predictions with results from Gillespie simulations for two-species extinctions, complemented by an analytical calculation of the MTE in which the remaining third species goes extinct. From Gillespie simulations we also analyze how the distributions of times to extinction change upon varying the bifurcation parameter. Even within the same model and the same dynamical regime, the MTE depends on the distance from the bifurcation point in a way that contains the system size dependence in the exponent. It is challenging and worthwhile to quantify how rare the rare events of extinction are.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.