Paper detail

Rapidly Mixing Markov Chains: A Comparison of Techniques (A Survey)

We survey existing techniques to bound the mixing time of Markov chains. The mixing time is related to a geometric parameter called conductance which is a measure of edge-expansion. Bounds on conductance are typically obtained by a technique called "canonical paths" where the idea is to find a set of paths, one between every source-destination pair, such that no edge is heavily congested. However, the canonical paths approach cannot always show rapid mixing of a rapidly mixing chain. This drawback disappears if we allow the flow between a pair of states to be spread along multiple paths. We prove that for a large class of Markov chains canonical paths does capture rapid mixing. Allowing multiple paths to route the flow still does help a great deal in proofs, as illustrated by a result of Morris & Sinclair (FOCS'99) on the rapid mixing of a Markov chain for sampling 0/1 knapsack solutions. A different approach to prove rapid mixing is "Coupling". Path Coupling is a variant discovered by Bubley & Dyer (FOCS'97) that often tremendously reduces the complexity of designing good Couplings. We present several applications of Path Coupling in proofs of rapid mixing. These invariably lead to much better bounds on mixing time than known using conductance, and moreover Coupling based proofs are typically simpler. This motivates the question of whether Coupling can be made to work whenever the chain is rapidly mixing. This question was answered in the negative by Kumar & Ramesh (FOCS'99), who showed that no Coupling strategy can prove the rapid mixing of the Jerrum-Sinclair chain for sampling perfect and near-perfect matchings.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.