Paper detail

Rapid Reionization by the Oligarchs: The Case for Massive, UV-Bright, Star-Forming Galaxies with High Escape Fractions

The protagonists of cosmic reionization remain elusive. Faint star-forming galaxies are leading candidates because they are numerous and may have significant ionizing photon escape fractions ($f_{esc}$). Here we update this picture via an empirical model that successfully predicts latest observations (e.g., the drop in star-formation density at z>8). We generate an ionizing spectrum for each galaxy in our model and constrain $f_{esc}$ using latest measurements of the reionization timeline (e.g., Ly$α$ damping of quasars and galaxies at z>7). Assuming a constant $f_{esc}$, we find $M_{UV}$<-13.5 galaxies need $f_{esc}=0.21^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$ to complete reionization. The inferred IGM neutral fraction is [0.9, 0.5, 0.1] at z=[8.2, 6.8, 6.2]$\pm$0.2, i.e., the bulk of reionization transpires in 300 Myrs. Inspired by the emergent sample of Lyman Continuum (LyC) leakers that overwhelmingly displays higher-than-average star-formation surface density ($Σ$), we propose a model relating $f_{esc}$ to $Σ$ and find $f_{esc}\proptoΣ^{0.4\pm0.1}$. Since $Σ$ falls by ~2.5 dex between z=8 and z=0, our model explains the humble upper limits on $f_{esc}$ at lower redshifts and its required evolution to ~0.2 at z>6. Within this model, strikingly, <5% of galaxies with $M_{UV}$<-18 (the `oligarchs') account for >80% of the reionization budget. In fact, faint sources ($M_{UV}$>-16) must be relegated to a limited role to ensure high neutral fractions at z=7-8. Shallow faint-end slopes of the UV luminosity function ($α$>-2) and/or $f_{esc}$ distributions skewed toward bright galaxies produce the required late and rapid reionization. We predict LyC leakers like COLA1 (z=6.6, $f_{esc}$~30%, $M_{UV}$=-21.5) become increasingly common towards z~6 and that the drivers of reionization do not lie hidden across the faint-end of the luminosity function, but are already known to us. (abridged)

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.