Paper detail

Rapid-Process Nucleosynthesis in Neutrino-Magneto-Centrifugally Driven Winds

We have studied whether the rotation and magnetic fields in neutrino-driven winds can be key processes for the rapid-process (r-process) nucleosynthesis. We have examined the features of a steady and subsonic wind solutions which extend the model of Weber and Davis (1967), which is a representative solar wind model. As a result, we found that the entropy per baryon becomes lower and the dynamical timescale becomes longer as the angular velocity becomes higher. These results are inappropriate for the production of the r-process nuclei. As for the effects of magnetic fields, we found that a solution as a steady wind from the surface of the proto-neutron star can not be obtained when the strength of the magnetic field becomes $\ge$ $10^{11}$ G. Since the magnetic field in normal pulsars is of order $10^{12}$ G, a steady wind solution might not be realized there, which means that the models in this study may not be adopted for normal proto-neutron stars. In this situation, we have little choice but to conclude that it is difficult to realize a successful r-process nucleosynthesis in the wind models in this framework.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.