Paper detail

Rapid Evolution of the Innermost Dust Disk of Protoplanetary Disks Surrounding Intermediate-mass Stars

We derived the intermediate-mass (~=1.5--7 M_sun) disk fraction (IMDF) in the near-infrared JHK photometric bands as well as in the mid-infrared (MIR) bands for young clusters in the age range of 0 to ~10 Myr. From the JHK IMDF, the lifetime of the innermost dust disk (~0.3 AU; hereafter the K disk) is estimated to be ~3 Myr, suggesting a stellar mass (M*) dependence of K-disk lifetime proportional to M*^-0.7. However, from the MIR IMDF, the lifetime of the inner disk (~5 AU; hereafter the MIR disk) is estimated to be ~6.5 Myr, suggesting a very weak stellar mass dependence (proportional to M*^-0.2). The much shorter K-disk lifetime compared to the MIR-disk lifetime for intermediate-mass (IM) stars suggests that IM stars with transition disks, which have only MIR excess emission but no K-band excess emission, are more common than classical Herbig Ae/Be stars, which exhibit both. We suggest that this prominent early disappearance of the K disk for IM stars is due to dust settling/growth in the protoplanetary disk, and it could be one of the major reasons for the paucity of close-in planets around IM stars.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.