Paper detail

Rapid early coeval star formation and assembly of the most massive galaxies in the universe

The current consensus on the formation and evolution of the brightest cluster galaxies is that their stellar mass forms early ($z \gtrsim 4$) in separate galaxies that then eventually assemble the main structure at late times ($z \lesssim 1$). However, advances in observational techniques have led to the discovery of protoclusters out to $z \sim 7$, suggesting that the late-assembly picture may not be fully complete. If these protoclusters assemble rapidly in the early universe, they should form the brightest cluster galaxies much earlier than suspected by the late-assembly picture. Using a combination of observationally constrained hydrodynamical and dark-matter-only simulations, we show that the stellar assembly time of a sub-set of the brightest cluster galaxies occurs at high redshifts ($z > 3$) rather than at low redshifts ($z < 1$), as is commonly thought. We find, using isolated non-cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, that highly overdense protoclusters assemble their stellar mass into brightest cluster galaxies within $\sim 1$ $\mathrm{Gyr}$ of evolution -- producing massive blue elliptical galaxies at high redshifts ($z \gtrsim 1.5$). We argue that there is a downsizing effect on the cluster scale wherein some of the brightest cluster galaxies in the cores of the most-massive clusters assemble earlier than those in lower-mass clusters. In those clusters with $z = 0$ virial mass $\geqslant 5\times10^{14}$ M$_\mathrm{\odot}$, we find that $9.8$% have their cores assembly early, and a higher fraction of $16.4$% in those clusters above $10^{15}$ M$_\mathrm{\odot}$. The James Webb Space Telescope will be able to detect and confirm our prediction in the near future, and we discuss the implications to constraining the value of $σ_\mathrm{8}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.