Paper detail

Rapid and efficient mass collection by a supersonic cloud-cloud collision as a major mechanism of high-mass star formation

A supersonic cloud-cloud collision produces a shock-compressed layer which leads to formation of high-mass stars via gravitational instability. We carried out a detailed analysis of the layer by using the numerical simulations of magneto-hydrodynamics which deal with colliding molecular flows at a relative velocity of 20 km s$^{-1}$ (Inoue & Fukui 2013). Maximum density in the layer increases from 1000 cm$^{-3}$ to more than $10^{5}$ cm$^{-3}$ within 0.3 Myrs by compression, and the turbulence and the magnetic field in the layer are amplified by a factor of $\sim 5$, increasing the mass accretion rate by two orders of magnitude to more than $10^{-4}$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. The layer becomes highly filamentary due to gas flows along the magnetic field lines, and dense cores are formed in the filaments. The massive dense cores have size and mass of 0.03 -- 0.8 pc and 8 -- 50 $M_{\odot}$ and they are usually gravitationally unstable. The mass function of the dense cores is significantly top-heavy as compared with the universal IMF, indicating that the cloud-cloud collision triggers preferentially the formation of O and early B stars. We argue that the cloud-cloud collision is a versatile mechanism which creates a variety of stellar clusters from a single O star like RCW120 and M20 to tens of O stars of a super star cluster like RCW38 and a mini-starburst W43. The core mass function predicted by the present model is consistent with the massive dense cores obtained by recent ALMA observations in RCW38 (Torii et al. 2019) and W43 (Motte et al. 2018) considering the increasing evidence for collision-triggered high-mass star formation, we argue that cloud-cloud collision is a major mechanism of high mass star formation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.