Paper detail

Rapid adjustment and post-processing of temperature forecast trajectories

Modern weather forecasts are commonly issued as consistent multi-day forecast trajectories with a time resolution of 1-3 hours. Prior to issuing, statistical post-processing is routinely used to correct systematic errors and misrepresentations of the forecast uncertainty. However, once the forecast has been issued, it is rarely updated before it is replaced in the next forecast cycle of the numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. This paper shows that the error correlation structure within the forecast trajectory can be utilized to substantially improve the forecast between the NWP forecast cycles by applying additional post-processing steps each time new observations become available. The proposed rapid adjustment is applied to temperature forecast trajectories from the UK Met Office's convective-scale ensemble MOGREPS-UK. MOGREPS-UK is run four times daily and produces hourly forecasts for up to 36 hours ahead. Our results indicate that the rapidly adjusted forecast from the previous NWP forecast cycle outperforms the new forecast for the first few hours of the next cycle, or until the new forecast itself can be rapidly adjusted, suggesting a new strategy for updating the forecast cycle.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.