Paper detail

Rank-related dimension bounds for subspaces of symmetric bilinear forms

Let V be a vector space of dimension n over a field K and let Symm(V) denote the space of symmetric bilinear forms defined on V x V. Let M be a subspace of Symm(V). We investigate a variety of hypotheses concerning the rank of elements in M that lead to reasonable bounds for dim M. For example, if every non-zero element of M has odd rank, and r is the maximum rank of the elements of M, then dim M is at most r(r+1)/2 (thus dim M is bounded independently of n). This should be contrasted with the simple observation that Symm(V) contains a subspace of dimension n-1 in which each non-zero element has rank 2. The bound r(r+1)/2 is almost certainly too large, and a bound r seems plausible, this being true when K is finite. We also show that dim M is at most r$ when K is any field of characteristic 2. Finally, suppose that n=2r, where r is an odd integer, and the rank of each non-zero element of M is either r or n. We show that if K has characteristic 2, then dim M is at most 3r. Furthermore, if dim M=3r, we obtain interesting subspace decompositions of M and V related to spreads, pseudo-arcs and pseudo-ovals. Examples of such subspaces M exist if K has an extension field of degree r.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.