Paper detail

Rank deficiency in sparse random GF[2] matrices

Let $M$ be a random $m \times n$ matrix with binary entries and i.i.d. rows. The weight (i.e., number of ones) of a row has a specified probability distribution, with the row chosen uniformly at random given its weight. Let $N(n,m)$ denote the number of left null vectors in ${0,1}^m$ for $M$ (including the zero vector), where addition is mod 2. We take $n, m \to \infty$, with $m/n \to α> 0$, while the weight distribution may vary with $n$ but converges weakly to a limiting distribution on ${3, 4, 5, ...}$; let $W$ denote a variable with this limiting distribution. Identifying $M$ with a hypergraph on $n$ vertices, we define the 2-core of $M$ as the terminal state of an iterative algorithm that deletes every row incident to a column of degree 1. We identify two thresholds $α^*$ and $\underlineα$, and describe them analytically in terms of the distribution of $W$. Threshold $α^*$ marks the infimum of values of $α$ at which $n^{-1} \log{\mathbb{E} [N(n,m)}]$ converges to a positive limit, while $\underlineα$ marks the infimum of values of $α$ at which there is a 2-core of non-negligible size compared to $n$ having more rows than non-empty columns. We have $1/2 \leq α^* \leq \underlineα \leq 1$, and typically these inequalities are strict; for example when $W = 3$ almost surely, numerics give $α^* = 0.88949 ...$ and $\underlineα = 0.91793 ...$ (previous work on this model has mainly been concerned with such cases where $W$ is non-random). The threshold of values of $α$ for which $N(n,m) \geq 2$ in probability lies in $[α^*,\underlineα]$ and is conjectured to equal $\underlineα$. The random row weight setting gives rise to interesting new phenomena not present in the non-random case that has been the focus of previous work.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.