Paper detail

Range-compatible homomorphisms over fields with two elements

Let $U$ and $V$ be finite-dimensional vector spaces over a (commutative) field $\mathbb{K}$, and $\mathcal{S}$ be a linear subspace of the space $\mathcal{L}(U,V)$ of all linear operators from $U$ to $V$. A map $F : \mathcal{S} \rightarrow V$ is called range-compatible when $F(s) \in \text{Im}(s)$ for all $s \in \mathcal{S}$. In a previous work, we have classified all the range-compatible group homomorphisms provided that $\text{codim}(\mathcal{S}) \leq 2\,\text{dim}(V)-3$, except in the special case when $\mathbb{K}$ has only two elements and $\text{codim}(\mathcal{S}) = 2\,\text{dim}(V)-3$. In this article, we give a thorough treatment of that special case. Our results are partly based upon the recent classification of vector spaces of matrices with rank at most $2$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$. As an application, we classify the $2$-dimensional non-reflexive operator spaces over any field, and the affine subspaces of $\text{M}_{n,p}(\mathbb{K})$ with lower-rank $2$ and codimension $3$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.