Paper detail

Range Assignment of Base-Stations Maximizing Coverage Area without Interference

We study the problem of assigning non-overlapping geometric objects centered at a given set of points such that the sum of area covered by them is maximized. If the points are placed on a straight-line and the objects are disks, then the problem is solvable in polynomial time. However, we show that the problem is NP-hard even for simplest objects like disks or squares in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. Eppstein [CCCG, pages 260--265, 2016] proposed a polynomial time algorithm for maximizing the sum of radii (or perimeter) of non-overlapping balls or disks when the points are arbitrarily placed on a plane. We show that Eppstein's algorithm for maximizing sum of perimeter of the disks in ${\mathbb{R}}^2$ gives a $2$-approximation solution for the sum of area maximization problem. We propose a PTAS for our problem. These approximation results are extendible to higher dimensions. All these approximation results hold for the area maximization problem by regular convex polygons with even number of edges centered at the given points.

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.