Paper detail

Randomized Rumor Spreading in Poorly Connected Small-World Networks

Push-Pull is a well-studied round-robin rumor spreading protocol defined as follows: initially a node knows a rumor and wants to spread it to all nodes in a network quickly. In each round, every informed node sends the rumor to a random neighbor, and every uninformed node contacts a random neighbor and gets the rumor from her if she knows it. We analyze this protocol on random $k$-trees, a class of power law graphs, which are small-world and have large clustering coefficients, built as follows: initially we have a $k$-clique. In every step a new node is born, a random $k$-clique of the current graph is chosen, and the new node is joined to all nodes of the $k$-clique. When $k>1$ is fixed, we show that if initially a random node is aware of the rumor, then with probability $1-o(1)$ after $O\left((\log n)^{1+2/k}\cdot\log\log n\cdot f(n)\right)$ rounds the rumor propagates to $n-o(n)$ nodes, where $n$ is the number of nodes and $f(n)$ is any slowly growing function. Since these graphs have polynomially small conductance, vertex expansion $O(1/n)$ and constant treewidth, these results demonstrate that Push-Pull can be efficient even on poorly connected networks. On the negative side, we prove that with probability $1-o(1)$ the protocol needs at least $Ω\left(n^{(k-1)/(k^2+k-1)}/f^2(n)\right)$ rounds to inform all nodes. This exponential dichotomy between time required for informing almost all and all nodes is striking. Our main contribution is to present, for the first time, a natural class of random graphs in which such a phenomenon can be observed. Our technique for proving the upper bound carries over to a closely related class of graphs, random $k$-Apollonian networks, for which we prove an upper bound of $O\left((\log n)^{c_k}\cdot\log\log n\cdot f(n)\right)$ rounds for informing $n-o(n)$ nodes with probability $1-o(1)$ when $k>2$ is fixed. Here, $c_k=(k^2-3)/(k-1)^2<1 + 2/k$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.