Paper detail

Randomized Gossip Algorithm with Unreliable Communication

In this paper, we study an asynchronous randomized gossip algorithm under unreliable communication. At each instance, two nodes are selected to meet with a given probability. When nodes meet, two unreliable communication links are established with communication in each direction succeeding with a time-varying probability. It is shown that two particularly interesting cases arise when these communication processes are either perfectly dependent or independent. Necessary and sufficient conditions on the success probability sequence are proposed to ensure almost sure consensus or $ε$-consensus. Weak connectivity is required when the communication is perfectly dependent, while double connectivity is required when the communication is independent. Moreover, it is proven that with odd number of nodes, average preserving turns from almost forever (with probability one for all initial conditions) for perfectly dependent communication, to almost never (with probability zero for almost all initial conditions) for the independent case. This average preserving property does not hold true for general number of nodes. These results indicate the fundamental role the node interactions have in randomized gossip algorithms.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.