Paper detail

Randomized Extended Kaczmarz is a Limit Point of Sketch-and-Project

The sketch-and-project (SAP) framework for solving systems of linear equations has unified the theory behind popular projective iterative methods such as randomized Kaczmarz, randomized coordinate descent, and variants thereof. The randomized extended Kaczmarz (REK) method is a popular extension of randomized Kaczmarz for solving inconsistent systems, which has not yet been shown to lie within the SAP framework. In this work we show that, in a certain sense, REK may be expressed as the limit point of a family of SAP methods, but we argue that it is unlikely that REK can be translated into a SAP method itself. We provide an extensive theoretical analysis of the family of methods comprising said limit, including convergence guarantees and further connections to REK. We follow this with an array of experiments demonstrating these methods and their connections in practice.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.