Paper detail

Randomized estimation of spectral densities of large matrices made accurate

For a large Hermitian matrix $A\in \mathbb{C}^{N\times N}$, it is often the case that the only affordable operation is matrix-vector multiplication. In such case, randomized method is a powerful way to estimate the spectral density (or density of states) of $A$. However, randomized methods developed so far for estimating spectral densities only extract information from different random vectors independently, and the accuracy is therefore inherently limited to $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{N_{v}})$ where $N_{v}$ is the number of random vectors. In this paper we demonstrate that the "$\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{N_{v}})$ barrier" can be overcome by taking advantage of the correlated information of random vectors when properly filtered by polynomials of $A$. Our method uses the fact that the estimation of the spectral density essentially requires the computation of the trace of a series of matrix functions that are numerically low rank. By repeatedly applying $A$ to the same set of random vectors and taking different linear combination of the results, we can sweep through the entire spectrum of $A$ by building such low rank decomposition at different parts of the spectrum. Under some assumptions, we demonstrate that a robust and efficient implementation of such spectrum sweeping method can compute the spectral density accurately with $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ computational cost and $\mathcal{O}(N)$ memory cost. Numerical results indicate that the new method can significantly outperform existing randomized methods in terms of accuracy. As an application, we demonstrate a way to accurately compute a trace of a smooth matrix function, by carefully balancing the smoothness of the integrand and the regularized density of states using a deconvolution procedure.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.