Paper detail

Randomized Douglas-Rachford methods for linear systems: Improved accuracy and efficiency

The Douglas-Rachford (DR) method is a widely used method for finding a point in the intersection of two closed convex sets (feasibility problem). However, the method converges weakly and the associated rate of convergence is hard to analyze in general. In addition, the direct extension of the DR method for solving more-than-two-sets feasibility problems, called the $r$-sets-DR method, is not necessarily convergent. To improve the efficiency of the optimization algorithms, the introduction of randomization and the momentum technique has attracted increasing attention. In this paper, we propose the randomized $r$-sets-DR (RrDR) method for solving the feasibility problem derived from linear systems, showing the benefit of the randomization as it brings linear convergence in expectation to the otherwise divergent $r$-sets-DR method. Furthermore, the convergence rate does not depend on the dimension of the coefficient matrix. We also study RrDR with heavy ball momentum and establish its accelerated rate. Numerical experiments are provided to confirm our results and demonstrate the notable improvements in accuracy and efficiency of the DR method, brought by the randomization and the momentum technique.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.