Paper detail

Randomized Alternating Least Squares for Canonical Tensor Decompositions: Application to a PDE with Random Data

This paper introduces a randomized variation of the alternating least squares (ALS) algorithm for rank reduction of canonical tensor formats. The aim is to address the potential numerical ill-conditioning of least squares matrices at each ALS iteration. The proposed algorithm, dubbed randomized ALS, mitigates large condition numbers via projections onto random tensors, a technique inspired by well-established randomized projection methods for solving overdetermined least squares problems in a matrix setting. A probabilistic bound on the condition numbers of the randomized ALS matrices is provided, demonstrating reductions relative to their standard counterparts. Additionally, results are provided that guarantee comparable accuracy of the randomized ALS solution at each iteration. The performance of the randomized algorithm is studied with three examples, including manufactured tensors and an elliptic PDE with random inputs. In particular, for the latter, tests illustrate not only improvements in condition numbers, but also improved accuracy of the iterative solver for the PDE solution represented in a canonical tensor format.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.