Paper detail

Random walk in a high density dynamic random environment

The goal of this note is to prove a law of large numbers for the empirical speed of a green particle that performs a random walk on top of a field of red particles which themselves perform independent simple random walks on $\Z^d$, $d \geq 1$. The red particles jump at rate 1 and are in a Poisson equilibrium with density $μ$. The green particle also jumps at rate 1, but uses different transition kernels $p'$ and $p''$ depending on whether it sees a red particle or not. It is shown that, in the limit as $μ\to\infty$, the speed of the green particle tends to the average jump under $p'$. This result is far from surprising, but it is non-trivial to prove. The proof that is given in this note is based on techniques that were developed in \cite{KeSi} to deal with spread-of-infection models. The main difficulty is that, due to particle conservation, space-time correlations in the field of red particles decay slowly. This places the problem in a class of random walks in dynamic random environments for which scaling laws are hard to obtain.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.