Paper detail

Random Transverse Field Ising Model in dimension $d>1$ : scaling analysis in the disordered phase from the Directed Polymer model

For the quantum Ising model with ferromagnetic random couplings $J_{i,j}>0$ and random transverse fields $h_i>0$ at zero temperature in finite dimensions $d>1$, we consider the lowest-order contributions in perturbation theory in $(J_{i,j}/h_i)$ to obtain some information on the statistics of various observables in the disordered phase. We find that the two-point correlation scales as : $\ln C(r) \sim - \frac{r}{ξ_{typ}} +r^ω u$, where $ξ_{typ} $ is the typical correlation length, $u$ is a random variable, and $ω$ coincides with the droplet exponent $ω_{DP}(D=d-1)$ of the Directed Polymer with $D=(d-1)$ transverse directions. Our main conclusions are (i) whenever $ω>0$, the quantum model is governed by an Infinite-Disorder fixed point : there are two distinct correlation length exponents related by $ν_{typ}=(1-ω)ν_{av}$ ; the distribution of the local susceptibility $χ_{loc}$ presents the power-law tail $P(χ_{loc}) \sim 1/χ_{loc}^{1+μ}$ where $μ$ vanishes as $ξ_{av}^{-ω} $, so that the averaged local susceptibility diverges in a finite neighborhood $0<μ<1$ before criticality (Griffiths phase) ; the dynamical exponent $z$ diverges near criticality as $z=d/μ\sim ξ_{av}^ω$ (ii) in dimensions $d \leq 3$, any infinitesimal disorder flows towards this Infinite-Disorder fixed point with $ω(d)>0$ (for instance $ω(d=2)=1/3$ and $ω(d=3) \sim 0.24$) (iii) in finite dimensions $d > 3$, a finite disorder strength is necessary to flow towards the Infinite-Disorder fixed point with $ω(d)>0$ (for instance $ω(d=4) \simeq 0.19$), whereas a Finite-Disorder fixed point remains possible for a small enough disorder strength. For the Cayley tree of effective dimension $d=\infty$ where $ω=0$, we discuss the similarities and differences with the case of finite dimensions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.