Abstract

We explore two notions of stationary processes. The first is called a random-step Markov process in which the stationary process of states, (Xi)i∈Z(X_i)_{i \in \mathbb{Z}} has a stationary coupling with an independent process on the positive integers, (Li)i∈Z(L_i)_{i \in \mathbb{Z}} of `random look-back distances'. That is, L0L_0 is independent of the `past states', (Xi,Li)i<0(X_i, L_i)_{i<0}, and for every positive integer nn, the probability distribution on the `present', X0X_0, conditioned on the event {L0=n}\{L_0 = n\} and on the past is the same as the probability distribution on X0X_0 conditioned on the `nn-past', (Xi)−n≤i<0(X_i)_{-n\leq i <0} and {L0=n}\{L_0 = n\}. A random Markov process is a generalization of a Markov chain of order nn and has the property that the distribution on the present given the past can be uniformly approximated given the nn-past, for nn sufficiently large. Processes with the latter property are called uniform martingales, closely related to the notion of a `continuous gg-function'. We show that every stationary process on a countable alphabet that is a uniform martingale and is dominated by a finite measure is also a random Markov process and that the random variables (Li)i∈Z(L_i)_{i \in \mathbb{Z}} and associated coupling can be chosen so that the distribution on the present given the nn-past and the event {L0=n}\{L_0 = n\} is `deterministic': all probabilities are in {0,1}\{0,1\}. In the case of finite alphabets, those random-step Markov processes for which L0L_0 can be chosen with finite expected value are characterized. For stationary processes on an uncountable alphabet, a stronger condition is also considered which is sufficient to imply that a process is a random Markov processes. In addition, a number of examples are given throughout to show the sharpness of the results.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.