Paper detail

Random Regular Bipartite Graphs Satisfy Weak Virial Positivity, for a Large Range of the Parameters

We deal with $r$-regular bipartite graphs with $2n$ vertices. In a previous paper, Butera, Pernici and the author have introduced a quantity $u(i)$, $u(i) = -\ln(i!m\_i)$, a function of the number of $i$-matchings, $m\_i$, and conjectured that the fraction of graphs that violate $Δ^k u(i) > 0$ for $k > 1$ vanishes as $n$ goes to infinity. Here $Δ$ is the finite difference operator. We now more particularly define the "Virial Positivity Conjecture" as the conjecture that the fraction of graphs that satisfy $Δ^k u(i)$ go to 0 for all $k > 1$ and $i$, approaches 1 as $n$ goes to infinity. The "Weak Virial Positivity Conjecture" is the conjecture that for each $i$ and $k > 1$ the probability that $Δ^k u(i) > 0$ goes to $1$ as $n$ goes to infinity. The term Virial is used since the condition $Δ^k u(i) > 0$ corresponds to the positivity of the Virial coefficients for infinite regular lattices. Herein we prove Weak Virial Positivity for the range of parameters $r < 11$, $i+k < 101$, $1 < k < 28$,or $i+k < 30$ all $r$. A formalism of Wanless as systematized by Pernici is central to this effort. Basically this paper is a corollary to our parallel attack on graph positivity in a previous paper. We assume basic knowledge of this previous paper.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.