Paper detail

Random potentials for pinning models with \nabla and Δinteractions

We consider two models for biopolymers, the $\nabla$ interaction and the $Δ$ one, both with the Gaussian potential in the random environment. A random field $φ:{0,1,...,N}\rightarrow \Bbb{R}^d$ represents the position of the polymer path. The law of the field is given by $\exp(-\sum_i\frac{|\nablaφ_i|^2}{2})$ where $\nabla$ is the discrete gradient, and by $\exp(-\sum_i\frac{|Δφ_i|^2}{2})$ where $Δ$ is the discrete Laplacian. For every Gaussian potential $\frac{|\cdot|^2}{2}$, a random charge is added as a factor: $(1+βω_i)\frac{|\cdot|^2}{2}$ with $\Bbb{P}(ω_i=\pm 1)=1/2$ or $\exp(βω_i)\frac{|\cdot|^2}{2}$ with $ω_i$ obeys a normal distribution. The interaction with the origin in the random field space is considered. Each time the field touches the origin, a reward $ε\geq 0$ is given. Although these models are quite different from the pinning models studied in Giacomin (2007), the result about the gap between the annealed critical point and the quenched critical point stays the same.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.