Paper detail

Random networks with preferential growth and vertex death

A dynamic model for a random network evolving in continuous time is defined where new vertices are born and existing vertices may die. The fitness of a vertex is defined as the accumulated in-degree of the vertex and a new vertex is connected to an existing vertex with probability proportional to a function $b$ of the fitness of the existing vertex. Furthermore, a vertex dies at a rate given by a function $d$ of its fitness. Using results from the theory of general branching processes, an expression for the asymptotic empirical fitness distribution $\{p_k\}$ is derived and analyzed for a number of specific choices of $b$ and $d$. When $b(i)=i+α$ and $d(i)=β$ -- that is, linear preferential attachment for the newborn and random deaths -- then $p_k\sim k^{-(2+α)}$. When $b(i)=i+1$ and $d(i)=β(i+1)$, with $β<1$, then $p_k\sim (1+β)^{-k}$, that is, if also the death rate is proportional to the fitness, then the power law distribution is lost. Furthermore, when $b(i)=i+1$ and $d(i)=β(i+1)^γ$, with $β,γ<1$, then $\log p_k\sim -k^γ$ -- a stretched exponential distribution. The momentaneous in-degrees are also studied and simulations suggest that their behaviour is qualitatively similar to that of the fitnesses.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.