Paper detail

Random Models for Exploring Planet Compositions I: Uranus as an Example

Modeling the interior of a planet is difficult because the small number of measured parameters is insufficient to constrain the many variables involved in describing the interior structure and composition. One solution is to invoke additional constraints based on arguments about how the planet formed. However, a planet's actual structure and composition may hold clues to its formation which would be lost if this structure were not allowed by the initial assumptions. It is therefore interesting to explore the space of allowable compositions and structures in order to better understand which cosmogonic constraints are absolutely necessary. To this end, we describe a code for generating random, monotonic, density distributions, rho(r), that fit a given mass, radius, and moment of inertia. Integrating the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium gives the pressure, P(r), at each point in the body. We then provide three algorithms for generating a monotonic temperature distribution, T(r), and an associated composition that is consistent with the rho-P relation, and realistic equations of state. We apply this code to Uranus as a proof of concept, and show that the ratio of rock to water cannot be much larger than 2.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.