Paper detail

Random linear systems with sparse solutions -- asymptotics and large deviations

In this paper we revisit random linear under-determined systems with sparse solutions. We consider $\ell_1$ optimization heuristic known to work very well when used to solve these systems. A collection of fundamental results that relate to its performance analysis in a statistical scenario is presented. We start things off by recalling on now classical phase transition (PT) results that we derived in \cite{StojnicCSetam09,StojnicUpper10}. As these represent the so-called breaking point characterizations, we now complement them by analyzing the behavior in a zone around the breaking points in a sense typically used in the study of the large deviation properties (LDP) in the classical probability theory. After providing a conceptual solution to these problems we attack them on a "hardcore" mathematical level attempting/hoping to be able to obtain explicit solutions as elegant as those we obtained in \cite{StojnicCSetam09,StojnicUpper10} (this time around though, the final characterizations were to be expected to be way more involved than in \cite{StojnicCSetam09,StojnicUpper10}, simply, the ultimate goals are set much higher and their achieving would provide a much richer collection of information about the $\ell_1$'s behavior). Perhaps surprisingly, the final LDP $\ell_1$ characterizations that we obtain happen to match the elegance of the corresponding PT ones from \cite{StojnicCSetam09,StojnicUpper10}. Moreover, as we have done in \cite{StojnicEquiv10}, here we also present a corresponding LDP set of results that can be obtained through an alternative high-dimensional geometry approach. Finally, we also prove that the two types of characterizations, obtained through two substantially different mathematical approaches, match as one would hope that they do.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.