Paper detail

Random cascade models of multifractality : real-space renormalization and travelling-waves

Random multifractals occur in particular at critical points of disordered systems. For Anderson localization transitions, Mirlin and Evers [PRB 62,7920 (2000)] have proposed the following scenario (a) the Inverse Participation Ratios (I.P.R.) $Y_q(L)$ display the following fluctuations between the disordered samples of linear size $L$ : with respect to the typical value $Y^{typ}_q(L) = e^{\bar{\ln Y_q(L)}} \sim L^{- τ_{typ}(q)} $ that involve the typical multifractal spectrum $τ_{typ}(q)$, the rescaled variable $y=Y_q(L)/Y^{typ}_q(L) $ is distributed with a scale-invariant distribution presenting the power-law tail $1/y^{1+β_q}$, so that the disorder-averaged I.P.R. $\bar{Y_q(L)} \sim L^{- τ_{av}(q)} $ have multifractal exponents $τ_{av}(q) $ that differ from the typical ones $τ_{typ}(q)$ whenever $β_q<1$; (b) the tail exponents $β_q$ and the multifractal exponents are related by the relation $β_q τ_{typ}(q)=τ_{av}(q β_q)$. Here we show that this scenario can be understood by considering the real-space renormalization equations satisfied by the I.P.R. For the simplest multifractals described by random cascades, these renormalization equations are formally similar to the recursion relations for disordered models defined on Cayley trees and they admit travelling-wave solutions for the variable $(\ln Y_q)$ in the effective time $t_{eff}=\ln L$ : the exponent $τ_{typ}(q)$ represents the velocity, whereas the tail exponent $β_q$ represents the usual exponential decay of the travelling-wave tail. In addition, we obtain that the relation (b) above can be obtained as a self-consistency condition from the self-similarity of the multifractal spectrum at all scales. Our conclusion is thus that the Mirlin-Evers scenario should apply to other types of random critical points, and even to random multifractals occurring in other fields.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.