Paper detail

Ramsey non-goodness involving books

In 1983, Burr and Erdős initiated the study of Ramsey goodness problems.Nikiforov and Rousseau (2009) resolved almost all goodness questions raised by Burr and Erdős, in which the bounds on the parameters are of tower type since their proofs rely on the regularity lemma. Let $B_{k,n}$ be the book graph on $n$ vertices which consists of $n-k$ copies of $K_{k+1}$ all sharing a common $K_k$, and let $H=K_p(a_1,\dots,a_{p})$ be the complete $p$-partite graph with parts of sizes $a_1,\dots,a_{p}$. Recently, avoiding use of the regularity lemma, Fox, He and Wigderson (2021) revisit several Ramsey goodness results involving books. They comment that it would be very interesting to see how far one can push these ideas. In particular, they conjecture that for all integers $k, p, t\ge 2$, there exists some $δ>0$ such that for all $n\ge 1$, $1\leq a_1\le\cdots\le a_{p-1}\le t$ and $a_p \le δn$, we have $r(H, B_{k,n})= (p-1)(n-1)+d_k(n,K_{a_1,a_2})+1,$ where $d_k(n,K_{a_1,a_2})$ is the maximum $d$ for which there is an $(n+d-1)$-vertex $K_{a_1,a_2}$-free graph in which at most $k-1$ vertices have degree less than $d$.They verify the conjecture when $a_1=a_2=1$. Building upon the work of Fox et al. (2021), we make a substantial step by showing that the conjecture "roughly" holds if $a_1=1$ and $a_2|(n-1-k)$, i.e. $a_2$ divides $n-1-k$. Moreover, avoiding use of the regularity lemma, we prove that for every $k, a\geq 1$ and $p\ge2$, there exists $δ>0$ such that for all large $n$ and $b\le δ\ln n$, $r(K_p(1,a,b,\dots,b), B_{k,n})= (p-1)(n-1)+k(p-1)(a-1)+1$ if $a|(n-1-k)$, where the case when $a=1$ has been proved by Nikiforov and Rousseau (2009) using the regularity lemma. The bounds on $1/δ$ we obtain are not of tower-type since our proofs do not rely on the regularity lemma.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.