Paper detail

Rainbow connection numbers of complementary graphs

A path in an edge-colored graph, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is a rainbow path if no two edges of it are colored the same. A nontrivial connected graph $G$ is rainbow connected if there is a rainbow path connecting any two vertices, and the rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by $rc(G)$, is the minimum number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. In this paper, we provide a new approach to investigate the rainbow connection number of a graph $G$ according to some constraints to its complement graph $\bar{G}$. We first derive that for a connected graph $G$, if $\bar{G}$ does not belong to the following two cases: $(i)$~$diam(\bar{G})=2,3$, $(ii)~\bar{G}$ contains exactly two connected components and one of them is trivial, then $rc(G)\leq 4$, where $diam(G)$ is the diameter of $G$. Examples are given to show that this bound is best possible. Next we derive that for a connected graph $G$, if $\bar{G}$ is triangle-free, then $rc(G)\leq 6$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.