Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the anti-Ramsey (more precisely, anti-van der Waerden) properties of arithmetic progressions. For positive integers nn and kk, the expression aw([n],k)aw([n],k) denotes the smallest number of colors with which the integers {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} can be colored and still guarantee there is a rainbow arithmetic progression of length kk. We establish that aw([n],3)=Θ(log⁡n)aw([n],3)=Θ(\log n) and aw([n],k)=n1−o(1)aw([n],k)=n^{1-o(1)} for k≥4k\geq 4. For positive integers nn and kk, the expression aw(Zn,k)aw(Z_n,k) denotes the smallest number of colors with which elements of the cyclic group of order nn can be colored and still guarantee there is a rainbow arithmetic progression of length kk. In this setting, arithmetic progressions can "wrap around," and aw(Zn,3)aw(Z_n,3) behaves quite differently from aw([n],3)aw([n],3), depending on the divisibility of nn. As shown in [Jungić et al., \textit{Combin. Probab. Comput.}, 2003], aw(Z2m,3)=3aw(Z_{2^m},3) = 3 for any positive integer mm. We establish that aw(Zn,3)aw(Z_n,3) can be computed from knowledge of aw(Zp,3)aw(Z_p,3) for all of the prime factors pp of nn. However, for k≥4k\geq 4, the behavior is similar to the previous case, that is, aw(Zn,k)=n1−o(1)aw(Z_n,k)=n^{1-o(1)}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.