Paper detail

Radioactive heating rate of r-process elements and macronova light curve

We study the heating rate of r-process nuclei and thermalization of decay products in neutron star merger ejecta and macronova (kilonova) light curves. Thermalization of charged decay products, i.e., electrons, $α$-particles, and fission fragments is calculated according to their injection energy. The $γ$-ray thermalization processes are also properly calculated by taking the $γ$-ray spectrum of each decay into account. We show that the $β$-decay heating rate at later times approaches a power-law decline as $\propto t^{-2.8}$, which agrees with the result of Waxman et al. (2019). We present a new analytic model to calculate macronova light curves, in which the density structure of the ejecta is accounted for. We demonstrate that the observed bolometric light curve and temperature evolution of the macronova associated with GW170817 are reproduced well by the $β$-decay heating rate with the solar r-process abundance pattern. We interpret the break in the observed bolometric light curve around a week as a result of the diffusion wave crossing a significant part of the ejecta rather than a thermalization break. We also show that the time-weighted integral of the bolometric light curve (Katz integral) is useful to provide an estimate of the total r-process mass from the observed data, which is independent of the highly uncertain radiative transfer. For the macronova in GW170817, the ejecta mass is robustly estimated as $\approx 0.05M_{\odot}$ for $A_{\rm min}\leq 72$ and $85\leq A_{\rm min}\leq 130$ with the solar r-process abundance pattern. The code for computation of the heating rate and light curve for given initial nuclear abundances is publicly available.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.